March 2020 • carol Collison

“The wine M&A market is small principally because there are few buyers, which tend to be other wine companies." 

To quote HRH the Queen of England circa 1992, 2019 was an “annus horribilis” for winery and wine brand acquisitions. 

The trouble started at some point in late 2018, when Goldman Sachs - which had the mandate to sell 30 of Constellation’s lower-priced wines – went to its M&A advisory “bag of tricks”. [i]  It was a leak to Reuters about the sale, then “valued” at $3.0bn.  This caught everyone’s attention in the industry.  As a wine M&A specialist, my reaction to the leak was that it appeared Constellation’s advisors didn’t understand the dynamics of the wine industry, where distributors are a force to be reckoned with.  A disclosure like this in the beverage alcohol space can do very dramatic damage to brands because distributors, faced with the possibility of losing the business to the buyer’s distribution network, can take their shoulder off the wheel of the brands that are for sale. 

It further appeared that in taking this risky step, Goldman had run out of ideas about buyers and was hoping to find someone in the global landscape that they hadn’t contacted during their confidential process.  Months later, a quote from Constellation’s CFO at an industry event - that they were only looking for 7X EBITDA for the brands - seemed to signal that there was a potential bidder they were trying to bring back to the table.

Finally, in April of 2019 a deal between Gallo and Constellation, by then worth (only) $1.7bn, was announced.  The parties intended to close by the end of May 2019, but in mid-May the FTC put the transaction on hold as it reviewed issues related to competition.  During what became a protracted process, originally thought to end by November 2019, rumors (which turned out to be true) circulated that the consolidation of a substantial portion of low-priced sparkling wine and brandy brands, in addition to grape concentrate (which is a winemaking input) was deemed to be anti-competitive, and those businesses would be taken out of the deal.  The transaction was now slated to close by the end of February 2020 with Gallo paying $850MM for the remaining brands, plus an additional $250MM if certain sales targets were met. 

What does this one transaction have to do with the wine M&A market as a whole?  First, that market is small.  Smaller than people think.  Based on research I conducted and published with Wines and Vines a number of years ago[ii], the average transaction volume is about 20 deals annually.  According to public reporting as tracked in our office, only 13 deals were announced in 2019.  (Compared to 20 completed and announced in 2018.)  The wine M&A market is small principally because there are few buyers, which tend to be other wine companies.  When two of the biggest and most active buyers are locked up in their own deal, and when there are rumors that some large acquisition targets for other active buyers (Cooks Sparkling, Paul Masson Brandy) might be had at bargain prices….  The already small pool of buyers shrinks further.  And the result is transaction activity 2/3s of an already small “normal”.

As I write in March of 2020 the Constellation/Gallo deal has not closed.  Industry contacts assure me that it will.  When?  No one knows.  We have recently seen some green shoots of business activity (including Gallo’s own acquisition of the Pahlmeyer brand).  It is still too soon to tell, but let’s all hope 2020 will be a “normal” year for winery and wine brand acquisitions.     


[i] This story that I am telling about the Constellation/Gallo deal is gleaned from public announcements and rumors and a little guesswork – I have no inside information.








Wine Industry Vinsights

Global Wine Partners | Our Latest Articles:

BLOG Cover Placeholder

May 2017

What Will Your Wine Company Sell For? (Part 2)

In April, GWP published Part 1 of this blog on winery transaction values, outlining a few of the reasons why the commonly referenced “EBITDA multiple” is not terribly predictive of what a winery owner might sell their company for in an actual transaction. The ultimate message of that piece and this one is that the real-world drivers of value in a transaction relate to the intersection of a seller’s brand attributes (growth, profitability, product category  etc.) and the needs of the buyer. Any one or more “multiple” of financial performance will not determine a price.

Napa Cabernet Grape Pricing

April 2017

Winery Valuation: The EBITDA Fallacy (Part 1)

There is often talk in wine business circles about the “EBITDA multiple” describing the valuation of a company after an acquisition is announced. However, this multiple may be irrelevant with respect to what drives the final transaction value when negotiating an actual sale between two parties. Commonly a 10X EBITDA multiple is talked about as “average” in today’s market. So, if you own a winery with “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization” equal to $1MM, your company will sell for $10MM, right? Maybe, but probably not.

Napa Cabernet Grape Pricing

November 2016

Napa Cabernet Sauvignon Wine vs. Grape Pricing

Because Napa grape costs are the highest in California, virtually all red wine made with Napa grapes must be retail priced at $40 or more per bottle for the winery to receive a reasonable profit. The majority of Napa’s production is from two Bordeaux varieties, Cabernet Sauvignon (43%) and Merlot (11%). When the other three Bordeaux varieties, Cab Franc, Malbec and Petit Verdot are added, production totals 59% of Napa’s grape crop.

Napa Cabernet Grape Pricing

August 2016

Timing the Market: When to Sell Your Winery

Most winery owners believe that the most important factor when considering a sale of their winery is market timing, i.e., timing a transaction to occur when the market for wineries is favorable. This sounds good in theory, but it requires predicting the future, which of course is fraught with peril.

Napa Cabernet Grape Pricing

June 2016

Sparkling Wine: It's Not Just From France Anymore

Bubbly, Champers, Sparklers, Fizz – when consumers are looking for sparkling wine, they are no longer simply being offered French Champagne. Other country’s products, like Italian Prosecco, Spanish Cava and US Méthode Champenoise are flooding the market.

Winery Small Businesses

May 2015

Wineries Are Small Businesses Too

Happy Small Business Week! I have been thinking a lot recently about the fact that most wineries are part of that quintessentially American story: entrepreneurship. What better time to acknowledge that fact than during a week dedicated to celebrating the vital role of small businesses in our economy and our culture?

Cons and Fraud in the Wine industry

May 2015

Wine and the Con Artist

A friend of mine and I were exchanging e-mails a few weeks ago about the mounting financial difficulties of Robert Dahl, the winery owner who became famous last week for murdering one of his investors in a vineyard just south of where I am sitting. My comment then about the people who create these types of financial disasters was, “it’s sometimes hard to distinguish between the stupid and the corrupt.” I think we have our answer now with regard to Mr. Dahl.

Cons and Fraud in the Wine industry

November 2014

Will 500 West Coast Wineries Sell?

In a report published by Silicon Valley Bank earlier this year (“Ownership Transitions in the Wine Industry”), more than 10% of the winery owners surveyed were “strongly considering” a sale in the next five years. Will 500 West Coast wineries actually be sold in the next five years? The short answer is no...